<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>MachForm Community Forums Topic: Feature request: LDAP integration</title>
<link>https://www.machform.com/forums/</link>
<description>MachForm Community Forums Topic: Feature request: LDAP integration</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 21:03:59 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>williamansley on "Feature request: LDAP integration"</title>
<link>https://www.machform.com/forums/topic/feature-request-ldap-integration#post-22651</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 04:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>williamansley</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22651@https://www.machform.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Yuniar, this is fantastic news for my institution. I am looking forward to version 4.3!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>mhannen on "Feature request: LDAP integration"</title>
<link>https://www.machform.com/forums/topic/feature-request-ldap-integration#post-22648</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2015 21:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>mhannen</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22648@https://www.machform.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Thanks, Yuniar. Can't wait to have LDAP authentication in MachForms. Can you tell us a little more about who it will be implemented or specific features of ldap auth?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>yuniar on "Feature request: LDAP integration"</title>
<link>https://www.machform.com/forums/topic/feature-request-ldap-integration#post-22647</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2015 16:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>yuniar</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22647@https://www.machform.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Sorry it took so long for this to be implemented, but I can tell you that LDAP authentication is coming into v4.3, very soon!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Saghalie on "Feature request: LDAP integration"</title>
<link>https://www.machform.com/forums/topic/feature-request-ldap-integration#post-22579</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2015 01:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Saghalie</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22579@https://www.machform.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;See if this will work for you.  I'm not sure if you want something like this or want it installed in to machform but I thought I would share.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://connect2id.com/products/json2ldap&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://connect2id.com/products/json2ldap&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;And no; I am not connected in any way with connect2id.com.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Regards,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Saghalie&#60;br /&#62;
&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.kcmhosting.com&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.kcmhosting.com&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>eventura on "Feature request: LDAP integration"</title>
<link>https://www.machform.com/forums/topic/feature-request-ldap-integration#post-22562</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>eventura</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22562@https://www.machform.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Us too!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>mhannen on "Feature request: LDAP integration"</title>
<link>https://www.machform.com/forums/topic/feature-request-ldap-integration#post-22529</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 23:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>mhannen</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22529@https://www.machform.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Please add us to the list of people who would like to see the LDAP feature added.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>nicholasdring on "Feature request: LDAP integration"</title>
<link>https://www.machform.com/forums/topic/feature-request-ldap-integration#post-22528</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 22:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>nicholasdring</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22528@https://www.machform.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;+1 that
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>piougy on "Feature request: LDAP integration"</title>
<link>https://www.machform.com/forums/topic/feature-request-ldap-integration#post-22267</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 01:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>piougy</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22267@https://www.machform.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Hello,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;We have the same need.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Thanks
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>williamansley on "Feature request: LDAP integration"</title>
<link>https://www.machform.com/forums/topic/feature-request-ldap-integration#post-21909</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 02:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>williamansley</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">21909@https://www.machform.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;We have modified Machform to tie into our LDAP to allow single sign-on (more or less) to Machform for our users. I say &#34;more or less&#34; because they have to use their full email address, not their user name (which, however, is the same as the first part of their email address), but at least we don't have to manage Machform passwords separately.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I just installed Machform 4.2 to our test instance of Machform, and I see that Appnitro has extensively modified the section of code that we have customized to allow Machform to tie into our LDAP. This code had remained virtually unchanged from at least Machform 3.5. This is not unexpected, given the security enhancement made to Machform 4.2, and I am not complaining about the change; I'm glad to see that Machform is being actively enhanced.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;But I would like to renew my request that the ability to allow Machform to be integrated with an existing LDAP for login credential verification instead of using login credentials created and managed within Machform be added to Machform. I'm sure we will figure out how to apply our customization to Machform 4.2, but we don't have any free to time to work on this for a while and we won't be able to upgrade from Machform 4.1 until we solve this problem.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;It would be so nice if this feature were built into Machform so that we didn't have to re-customize it each time an upgrade comes out. I expect that this would be a very helpful feature for many other institutional Machform users as well.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
