<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>MachForm Community Forums Topic: reCapcha with Signature</title>
<link>https://www.machform.com/forums/</link>
<description>MachForm Community Forums Topic: reCapcha with Signature</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 01:31:15 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>yuniar on "reCapcha with Signature"</title>
<link>https://www.machform.com/forums/topic/recapcha-with-signature#post-24514</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 10:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>yuniar</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">24514@https://www.machform.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Under the hood, the signature field is basically pretty much the same as any other text field. Spam bots can easily populate any random values to fill it.&#60;br /&#62;
So I'm afraid the signature field alone can't be used as an alternative to recaptcha :(
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>theMezz on "reCapcha with Signature"</title>
<link>https://www.machform.com/forums/topic/recapcha-with-signature#post-24445</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 03:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>theMezz</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">24445@https://www.machform.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Do you think reCapcha is needed if I have a signature field set as mandated ?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Comments?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;thanks
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
